{"id":115669,"date":"2025-07-22T09:55:18","date_gmt":"2025-07-22T07:55:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bioecoactual.com\/?p=115669"},"modified":"2025-07-22T09:55:18","modified_gmt":"2025-07-22T07:55:18","slug":"driving-pesticides-reduction-through-market-based-instruments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bioecoactual.com\/en\/2025\/07\/22\/driving-pesticides-reduction-through-market-based-instruments\/","title":{"rendered":"Beyond targets, driving pesticides reduction through market-based instruments"},"content":{"rendered":"

Since the rejection of the Sustainable Use of Pesticide Regulation (SUR) by the European Parliament in 2023, no new attempt to introduce a legally binding pesticide reduction target can be foreseen at the European level. According to IFOAM Organics Europe<\/strong>, this should not be a reason to abandon efforts to phase down synthetic pesticides, which continue to pose significant risks to human health and the environment. <\/p>\n

\"pesticides
123RFLimited\u00a9onuchcha. Spraying pesticides<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Pesticides contribute to the <\/strong>decline of biodiversity<\/strong><\/a>, notably of pollinator populations which are essential for food production, and they\u00a0increase the probability of developing certain diseases<\/a><\/strong>, especially for farmers, children, and pregnant women.<\/p>\n

“The costs associated with the side effects of pesticide use are substantial and are not reflected in their price. When accounting for spending on biodiversity preservation, water treatment measures, subsidies for conventional agriculture, and health expenditures spending to address the negative impacts of the use of pesticides is estimated at more than \u20ac18 billion per year”, IFOAM Organics Europe points out.<\/p>\n

In the absence of binding, ambitious regulations, alternative tools must be explored to reduce the use of synthetic pesticides and address their side effects. Pesticide taxes<\/strong> are a market-based instrument to incentivize the reduction of pesticide use. However, to be effective, they must be thoughtfully designed. Specifically, they should target the most harmful substances, calculate the tax based on the area treated rather than on the volume used, and be combined with other policy tools \u2013 namely, fiscal and regulatory.<\/p>\n